With all this Gamestop mess (Or is it Gamespot? I get fucking confused with that) there are bound to be people coming out of the wood-work that have opinions about reviews and reviewing. And if you think about it, it is advantageous for publishers to have the button mashed down hard on our reviewing collectivity. Just ask EA’s Kathy Vrabrek!
“They’re (causal gamers) not swayed by a low score on IGN or a low score out of one of these gaming sites. It’s a little bit amusing, in that it’s people reviewing games against measures that are important to core gamers yet are not important to casual gamers. Metacritic scores or the GameRankings scores are just off-base. In fact, if you run a regression analysis against those scores on casual games or even kids games, sales don’t correlate.”
I’ve never sounded off on causal gaming. There are plenty of mediums that have a casual product and a hardcore element. Hip hop is an example. Rock is another. You can dive as deep into a genre as you want, or as lightly as you want. But, just because Mom and Pop Wii don’t read Metacritic, doesn’t mean that EA shouldn’t go for the gold. You can package shit. You can sell shit. But it will still be shit. And when this causal trend wanes, and it will, the hardcore will be the only ones waiting in line for Rock Band 18. Casual gaming. Jeez. I haven’t done anything casual since I was five.
[via Nextgen]
Jayslacks.